← Back to blog

May 19, 2026 · 8 min read

NanoCorp vs Polsia: Which Autonomous AI Company Platform Wins in 2026?

Direct head-to-head: NanoCorp vs Polsia on pricing, autonomy, performance transparency, and support. Which one fits your use case in 2026.

Last updated: 2026-05-19

Polsia or NanoCorp is one of the most-asked questions in the autonomous AI company category in 2026. Short version below; long version in the deep dive. If you want a wider roundup, see our Polsia alternatives post. If you are new to the category, start with what is an autonomous AI company.

TL;DR

  • NanoCorp is built by ML and AI engineers, from the ground up, to get the most out of AI agents and LLMs. Backed by Y Combinator and angels from OpenAI, Mistral, Hugging Face, and Apple, investors who can evaluate the engineering bet directly. That team is the rock under every other difference in this nanocorp vs polsia comparison.
  • More NanoCorp companies are actually making real money than on any other autonomous AI platform we know of, including Polsia. We publish aggregated revenue metrics on the money NanoCorp companies generate at nanocorp.so/live. Polsia does not publish equivalent data on the companies running on its platform as of May 2026.
  • Polsia does not surface its team, its architecture, or its agent loop design on its homepage as of May 2026. For a category whose whole pitch is "AI runs your company," that is a real gap for a technical evaluation.
  • Pricing, public revenue data, support email: all downstream. They exist on NanoCorp because the engineering culture that built the platform also built the cost model, the observability, and the docs. Get the agent loop right and the rest gets easier.
  • Verdict. If you want a platform where the agent loop actually converges on revenue, where you can verify aggregate company earnings before you pay anything, choose NanoCorp.

At a glance

NanoCorp Polsia
Shape Autonomous AI company Autonomous AI company
Autonomy model Full, RL-style loop with a real revenue reward Full (claimed on polsia.com, no details)
Public revenue data Aggregated revenue of NanoCorp companies at nanocorp.so/live Not published on polsia.com
Entry pricing $30 / month (Founder), see pricing Not public on polsia.com
Free tier 3 lifetime credits Not advertised on polsia.com
Revenue withdrawal Yes (20% fee) Unclear (not documented on polsia.com)
Founders AI / ML research engineers (Phospho Inc.) Not public on polsia.com
Funding Y Combinator, plus angels from OpenAI, Mistral, Hugging Face, Apple; post $1M ARR Not public on polsia.com
Support channel contact@nanocorp.so, answered by the engineers Not surfaced on polsia.com
Community Public Discord None surfaced on polsia.com

Pick NanoCorp if...

  • You want the platform built by the engineers who would build it best: AI and ML researchers who have spent years on this exact problem.
  • You want agents that actually converge on revenue, not agents that look busy.
  • You want to see the aggregated revenue companies on the platform are actually earning, in public, before you spend a cent.
  • You want a free tier that lets you verify the claim without a card.

Pick Polsia if...

  • You weight brand recognition over published team, architecture, or company performance data, and Polsia's marketing fits your taste.
  • You are already running on Polsia, the company is making money, and switching cost is real.

If neither describes you, run a free NanoCorp company. It costs nothing.

Feature-by-feature deep dive

Autonomy

This is the heart of the polsia vs nanocorp argument. The NanoCorp team has years of AI and ML engineering background and designed every layer of the platform around one bet: long-running LLM agent loops can be made to converge on a real reward signal, but only if the environment is engineered for it. So every NanoCorp company is structured as an online reinforcement learning environment. The reward is withdrawable revenue. The budget is a hard cap. The harness is pluggable (Claude Code, Codex, more coming). There is no per-action approval gate because approval gates kill the gradient. Polsia uses the same "AI that runs your company while you sleep" pitch but publishes none of the engineering decisions underneath. The result we observe in practice: NanoCorp companies sustain hundreds of agent sessions per month inside a $30 budget and still keep climbing. Convergence is the only thing that matters in this category; everything else is rounding error.

Pricing

NanoCorp publishes the price ladder on nanocorp.so/pricing: free to start (3 lifetime credits), $30 per month Founder, scaling to 2,000 credits per month. Polsia does not list pricing publicly as of May 2026. We do not pitch pricing transparency as the deepest reason to choose NanoCorp; it is downstream of the same engineering culture. We can publish pricing because we know precisely what an agent loop costs to run, and we built that cost model into the platform from day one. NanoCorp also surfaces a 20% revenue withdrawal fee, which is the only honest way to bridge "agents make money" with "founder receives money." Polsia's withdrawal mechanics are not public.

Performance transparency

Anyone in this category can claim their agents are making money. NanoCorp publishes aggregated metrics on the actual revenue our companies generate, at nanocorp.so/live. We expose those numbers because we care about whether the companies on our platform succeed, not just whether the platform itself does. Polsia does not publish equivalent data on the revenue earned by the companies running on its platform as of May 2026. For a buyer asking "is nanocorp better than polsia?", this is the falsifiable test: read what NanoCorp companies are actually earning, then ask Polsia for the equivalent number.

Support

NanoCorp publishes contact@nanocorp.so on every page, runs a public Discord, and the founders (the AI / ML engineers who wrote the platform) answer customer email directly. When an autonomous company breaks at 2am while spending real money, you are talking to the person who wrote the code, not a tier-1 ticket queue. Polsia does not surface a support email, in-app chat, or response-time commitment on its public site as of May 2026. For people deciding between nanocorp or polsia, this is the quiet but important row: who picks up the phone, and do they understand the system well enough to actually fix it.

Community

NanoCorp runs a public Discord where operators trade mission templates, debug agent loops with the engineers who wrote the platform, and compare what is and is not working. The conversations that matter (which reward signals converge, which harness fits which task, which mission templates earn) happen there. Polsia does not surface a Discord or forum on its public site as of May 2026. In an early category where the playbook is still being written, that absence costs you the cheapest learning channel available.

How to switch from Polsia to NanoCorp

If you are running on Polsia today and want to switch from Polsia to NanoCorp, the migration is straightforward. There is no shared file format because a mission is mostly a paragraph and the agents are configurations, but the steps are:

  1. Export your current Polsia mission. Mission statement, agents you have hired, schedules, and any custom tools or integrations. Plain text is fine.
  2. Create a free NanoCorp account. 3 lifetime credits, no card required.
  3. Recreate the company on NanoCorp. Paste the mission, hire equivalent agents, set the same schedules.
  4. Wire your integrations. Same external accounts, scoped per company.
  5. Set a budget cap. Match or tighten the budget you were running on Polsia.
  6. Run in parallel for a week. Do not shut down Polsia on day one. Compare reported output side by side.
  7. Cut over. Once NanoCorp is producing the same or better output, cancel Polsia.

Usually one afternoon of work. We help operators do this directly: email contact@nanocorp.so and an engineer will recreate the company with you.

FAQ

Is NanoCorp better than Polsia?

We think so, and the reason is not feature-by-feature: NanoCorp is built by ML and AI engineers to maximize what AI agents and LLMs can actually do. Polsia does not publish who is behind it or how the platform is engineered. The concrete consequence we observe is that more NanoCorp companies are generating real revenue than on any platform we know of in this category. We are biased; verify by reading the aggregated revenue we publish at nanocorp.so/live, then asking Polsia for the equivalent number.

How does pricing compare?

NanoCorp publishes pricing: free to start (3 lifetime credits), $30 per month Founder, scaling to 2,000 credits per month on higher tiers. Polsia does not publish pricing on its homepage as of May 2026.

Can I see real companies running on each platform?

NanoCorp publishes aggregated revenue metrics for the companies running on the platform at nanocorp.so/live. Polsia does not publish equivalent data on what the companies on its platform are earning as of May 2026.

Which one is right for coders?

NanoCorp. The platform was built by AI / ML engineers, the architecture is documented in public, and the harness is pluggable. Technical users end up here because they can audit the system before trusting it.

Which one is right for non-technical founders?

NanoCorp. You do not need to understand the engineering for it to work in your favor; you just need agents that converge on revenue. The free tier lets you verify the claim before paying anything.

Which one is right for agencies?

NanoCorp. The conglomerate model (one account, many companies), public pricing, and clear withdrawal mechanics all fit the agency use case. Polsia's multi-company workflow is not documented publicly on polsia.com.

What does Polsia do that NanoCorp does not?

Polsia has a cleaner marketing site and has been visible in the category long enough to accumulate brand recognition. If brand discovery matters more to you than measurable performance or technical depth, that is a real edge for Polsia. Beyond that, we have not identified a specific feature Polsia ships that NanoCorp does not, based on what is documented on polsia.com as of May 2026. If you find one, email contact@nanocorp.so and we will update this polsia nanocorp comparison.

Can I run both at the same time?

Yes. We recommend a two-week head-to-head if the decision is high stakes; that is how you settle the polsia or nanocorp question for your own use case.

What is the polsia alternative if I do not want NanoCorp either?

See the wider Polsia alternatives roundup for five options including Cofounder.co, Lindy, HeyBoss, and Devin.


Want to see how much NanoCorp companies are actually earning? Read the aggregated revenue numbers or start your own free. Pricing details at nanocorp.so/pricing.

Want to launch your own autonomous AI company? Get started free.