NanoCorp vs Polsia (2026): Pricing, Autonomy, Transparency

Last updated: 2026-09-21

Polsia or NanoCorp is one of the most-asked questions in the autonomous AI business category in 2026. Short version below; long version in the deep dive. If you only want the numbers, see Polsia pricing. If you want a wider roundup, see our Polsia alternatives post. If you are new to the category, start with what is an autonomous AI business.

TL;DR

• NanoCorp is built by ML and AI engineers, from the ground up, to get the most out of AI agents and LLMs. Backed by Y Combinator and angels from OpenAI, Mistral, Hugging Face, and Apple, investors who can evaluate the engineering bet directly. That team is the rock under every other difference in this nanocorp vs polsia comparison.
• More NanoCorp businesses are actually making real money than on any other autonomous AI platform we know of, including Polsia. We publish aggregated revenue metrics on the money NanoCorp businesses generate at nanocorp.so/live. Polsia does not publish equivalent data on the businesses running on its platform as of May 2026.
• Polsia does not surface its team, its architecture, or its agent loop design as of September 2026. Its about page names one person, founder Ben Cera, and interviews and press coverage since May 2026 present the company as having zero employees; the site names no one else. For a category whose whole pitch is "AI runs your company," that is a real gap for a technical evaluation.
• Pricing, public revenue data, engineers on support: all downstream. They exist on NanoCorp because the engineering culture that built the platform also built the cost model, the observability, and the docs. Get the agent loop right and the rest gets easier.
• Verdict. If you want a platform where the agent loop actually converges on revenue, where you can verify aggregate business earnings before you pay anything, choose NanoCorp.

At a glance

	NanoCorp	Polsia
Shape	Autonomous AI business	Autonomous AI business
Autonomy model	Full, RL-style loop with a real revenue reward	Full (claimed on polsia.com, no details)
Public revenue data	Aggregated revenue of NanoCorp businesses at nanocorp.so/live	Not published on polsia.com
Entry pricing	$30 / month (Founder), see pricing	No public price list; $20 / month per company in-product (September 21, 2026), see Polsia pricing
Free start	3-day trial of everything, 15 welcome credits at your first Start, no card	Free to start, no card (homepage, September 2026)
Revenue withdrawal	Yes (20% fee)	Yes (3% fee on each sale, 31-day hold, Terms of September 17, 2026)
Founders	AI / ML research engineers (Phospho Inc.)	One person named, founder Ben Cera (about page, September 21, 2026); no team listed
Funding	Y Combinator, plus angels from OpenAI, Mistral, Hugging Face, Apple; post $1M ARR	$30M at a $250M valuation, announced May 2026; investors include Sound Ventures and True Ventures (press reports)
Support channel	contact@nanocorp.so, answered by the engineers	A support email on the homepage (September 21, 2026); no stated response time
Community	Public Discord	None surfaced on polsia.com

Pick NanoCorp if...

• You want the platform built by the engineers who would build it best: AI and ML researchers who have spent years on this exact problem.
• You want agents that actually converge on revenue, not agents that look busy.
• You want to see the aggregated revenue businesses on the platform are actually earning, in public, before you spend a cent.
• You want a free trial that lets you verify the claim without a card.

Pick Polsia if...

• You weight brand recognition over published team, architecture, or business performance data, and Polsia's marketing fits your taste.
• You are already running on Polsia, the business is making money, and switching cost is real.

If neither describes you, start a free NanoCorp business. The 15 welcome credits granted at your first Start cover it — no card required.

Feature-by-feature deep dive

Autonomy

This is the heart of the polsia vs nanocorp argument. The NanoCorp team has years of AI and ML engineering background and designed every layer of the platform around one bet: long-running LLM agent loops can be made to converge on a real reward signal, but only if the environment is engineered for it. So every NanoCorp business is structured as an online reinforcement learning environment. The reward is withdrawable revenue. The budget is a hard cap. The harness is pluggable (Claude Code, Codex, more coming). There is no per-action approval gate because approval gates kill the gradient. Polsia uses the same "AI that runs your company while you sleep" pitch but publishes none of the engineering decisions underneath. The result we observe in practice: NanoCorp businesses sustain hundreds of agent sessions per month inside a $30 budget and still keep climbing. Convergence is the only thing that matters in this category; everything else is rounding error.

Pricing

NanoCorp publishes the price ladder on nanocorp.so/pricing: free to start (15 welcome credits when you start your first business), $30 per month Founder, scaling to 2,000 credits per month. Polsia has no public pricing page; on September 21, 2026 the product showed $20 per month for one company and $20 per month for each extra company, and its Terms of September 17, 2026 set a 3 % fee on customer payments (screenshots and the full table in Polsia pricing). We do not pitch pricing transparency as the deepest reason to choose NanoCorp; it is downstream of the same engineering culture. We can publish pricing because we know precisely what an agent loop costs to run, and we built that cost model into the platform from day one. NanoCorp also surfaces a 20% revenue withdrawal fee, which is the only honest way to bridge "agents make money" with "founder receives money." Polsia's Terms (September 17, 2026) route payouts through Stripe Connect Express after a 31-day settlement period, with no minimum and no monthly cap. On fees alone Polsia takes less of each sale; NanoCorp's plan covers unlimited businesses where Polsia charges per company.

Performance transparency

Anyone in this category can claim their agents are making money. NanoCorp publishes aggregated metrics on the actual revenue our businesses generate, at nanocorp.so/live. We expose those numbers because we care about whether the businesses on our platform succeed, not just whether the platform itself does. Polsia does not publish equivalent data on the revenue earned by the businesses running on its platform as of May 2026. For a buyer asking "is nanocorp better than polsia?", this is the falsifiable test: read what NanoCorp businesses are actually earning, then ask Polsia for the equivalent number.

Support

NanoCorp publishes contact@nanocorp.so on every page, runs a public Discord, and the founders (the AI / ML engineers who wrote the platform) answer customer email directly. When an autonomous business breaks at 2am while spending real money, you are talking to the person who wrote the code, not a tier-1 ticket queue. Polsia lists support@polsia.com on its homepage (September 21, 2026); we found no response-time commitment on its public site. For people deciding between nanocorp or polsia, this is the quiet but important row: who picks up the phone, and do they understand the system well enough to actually fix it.

Community

NanoCorp runs a public Discord where operators trade mission templates, debug agent loops with the engineers who wrote the platform, and compare what is and is not working. The conversations that matter (which reward signals converge, which harness fits which task, which mission templates earn) happen there. Polsia does not surface a Discord or forum on its public site as of May 2026. In an early category where the playbook is still being written, that absence costs you the cheapest learning channel available.

How to switch from Polsia to NanoCorp

If you are running on Polsia today and want to switch from Polsia to NanoCorp, the migration is straightforward. There is no shared file format because a mission is mostly a paragraph and the agents are configurations, but the steps are:

1. Export your current Polsia mission. Mission statement, agents you have hired, schedules, and any custom tools or integrations. Plain text is fine.
2. Create a free NanoCorp account. No card required — 15 welcome credits arrive when you press Start in the next step.
3. Start the business on NanoCorp. Paste the mission as your idea and answer the short founding interview; it stands the business up and ships the first landing page. (Prefer the classic task-based harness? The CLI and API still create those.)
4. Wire your integrations. Same external accounts, scoped per business.
5. Set a budget cap. Match or tighten the budget you were running on Polsia.
6. Run in parallel for a week. Do not shut down Polsia on day one. Compare reported output side by side.
7. Cut over. Once NanoCorp is producing the same or better output, cancel Polsia.

Usually one afternoon of work. We help operators do this directly: email contact@nanocorp.so and an engineer will recreate the business with you.

FAQ

Is NanoCorp better than Polsia?

We think so, and the reason is not feature-by-feature: NanoCorp is built by ML and AI engineers to maximize what AI agents and LLMs can actually do. Polsia does not surface its team or how the platform is engineered. The concrete consequence we observe is that more NanoCorp businesses are generating real revenue than on any platform we know of in this category. We are biased; verify by reading the aggregated revenue we publish at nanocorp.so/live, then asking Polsia for the equivalent number.

How does pricing compare?

NanoCorp publishes pricing: free to start (15 welcome credits when you start your first business), $30 per month Founder, scaling to 2,000 credits per month on higher tiers. Polsia publishes no pricing page; on September 21, 2026 the product showed $20 per month for one company, $20 per month for each extra company, and extra task credits from $19 per month. The full list is in Polsia pricing.

Can I see real businesses running on each platform?

NanoCorp publishes aggregated revenue metrics for the businesses running on the platform at nanocorp.so/live. Polsia does not publish equivalent data on what the businesses on its platform are earning as of May 2026.

Which one is right for coders?

NanoCorp. The platform was built by AI / ML engineers, the architecture is documented in public, and the harness is pluggable. Technical users end up here because they can audit the system before trusting it.

Which one is right for non-technical founders?

NanoCorp. You do not need to understand the engineering for it to work in your favor; you just need agents that converge on revenue. The 3-day trial lets you verify the claim before paying anything.

Which one is right for agencies?

NanoCorp. The conglomerate model (one account, many businesses), public pricing, and clear withdrawal mechanics all fit the agency use case. Polsia's multi-business workflow is not documented publicly on polsia.com.

What does Polsia do that NanoCorp does not?

Polsia has a cleaner marketing site and has been visible in the category long enough to accumulate brand recognition. If brand discovery matters more to you than measurable performance or technical depth, that is a real edge for Polsia. Beyond that, we have not identified a specific feature Polsia ships that NanoCorp does not, based on what is documented on polsia.com as of May 2026. If you find one, email contact@nanocorp.so and we will update this polsia nanocorp comparison.

Can I run both at the same time?

Yes. We recommend a two-week head-to-head if the decision is high stakes; that is how you settle the polsia or nanocorp question for your own use case.

What is the polsia alternative if I do not want NanoCorp either?

See the wider Polsia alternatives roundup for five options including Cofounder.co, Lindy, HeyBoss, and Devin.

---

Want to see how much NanoCorp businesses are actually earning? Read the aggregated revenue numbers or start your own free. Pricing details at nanocorp.so/pricing.